top of page
Search

PFAS Victims and Lawsuits: Seeking Justice for Forever Chemical Harm

  • Writer: Ray Abad
    Ray Abad
  • Apr 30
  • 4 min read

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often called "forever chemicals" due to their persistence in the environment and human body, have sparked a wave of lawsuits as victims seek justice for health and environmental damages. Found in products like firefighting foam, non-stick cookware, and water-repellent fabrics, PFAS have been linked to serious health issues, including cancer, thyroid disease, and immune system disorders. This blog explores the impact of PFAS on victims, the legal battles unfolding, and what it means for those affected.

The Scope of PFAS Contamination

PFAS chemicals, such as PFOA and PFOS, have been used since the 1940s in consumer and industrial products. Their durability, while useful for manufacturing, means they do not break down naturally, leading to widespread contamination of water, soil, and air. Studies estimate PFAS are present in the blood of nearly 97% of Americans, with contamination detected in drinking water systems across the U.S.. Communities near military bases, industrial sites, and airports—where PFAS-laden firefighting foam (AFFF) was heavily used—are particularly hard-hit.

Victims include firefighters exposed through AFFF, residents drinking contaminated water, and workers in industries handling PFAS. Health risks are severe: the International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies PFOA as possibly carcinogenic, with strong links to kidney and testicular cancers. Other conditions, like thyroid disease and ulcerative colitis, are also associated with exposure.

The Legal Landscape: PFAS Lawsuits

Lawsuits against PFAS manufacturers, primarily 3M, DuPont, Chemours, and Tyco Fire Products, have surged since the early 2000s. These cases fall into three main categories:

  1. Personal Injury Claims: Individuals, especially firefighters and residents near contaminated sites, are filing lawsuits for health issues like cancer. For example, over 10,000 cases are part of the Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF) multidistrict litigation (MDL) in South Carolina, with plaintiffs alleging PFAS exposure caused serious illnesses.

  2. Environmental Contamination: States and municipalities are suing for cleanup costs and damages to natural resources. Texas, for instance, filed a lawsuit against 3M and DuPont in 2024, alleging deceptive marketing of products like Scotchgard and Teflon.

  3. Water System Contamination: Public water providers are seeking compensation for testing and remediation. A landmark $12.5 billion settlement with 3M in 2023 and a $1.18 billion settlement with DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva in 2023 addressed water system claims.

Key Milestones in PFAS Litigation

  • Early 2000s: A class action in Parkersburg, West Virginia, against DuPont for PFOA contamination settled in 2005 for $71 million, funding the C8 Science Panel. The panel’s findings in 2009 confirmed links between PFOA and health issues, leading to a $671 million settlement in 2017.

  • 2018: Minnesota settled with 3M for $850 million over water contamination.

  • 2023-2024: Major settlements included 3M’s $10.3-$12.5 billion for water systems and Tyco’s $750 million for public water providers.

  • 2025 Updates: The AFFF MDL continues to grow, with 10,934 cases as of November 2024. Recent court orders streamlined plaintiff fact-gathering, and bellwether trials for ulcerative colitis claims are scheduled.

Challenges for Victims

Proving causation is a significant hurdle. PFAS exposure is widespread, and linking specific health issues to a defendant’s actions requires robust evidence. Firefighters, for instance, must demonstrate occupational exposure caused their cancer, often relying on blood tests and expert testimony. Additionally, statutes of limitations vary by state, with deadlines as short as two years in some areas.

Despite challenges, settlements have provided relief. For example, the 3M settlement funds water system cleanup over 13 years, while personal injury cases are progressing toward bellwether trials to set precedents.

Corporate Accountability and Deception

Evidence suggests companies like 3M and DuPont knew about PFAS risks for decades but concealed them. A 1999 internal report at 3M revealed PFAS leaching into human bodies, yet the company suppressed the findings. Similarly, DuPont faced criticism for profiting from PFAS while ignoring environmental harm. Lawsuits allege these companies misrepresented products as safe, fueling public outrage and legal action.

What Victims Can Do

If you suspect PFAS exposure caused health issues, consider these steps:

  • Get Tested: Blood tests can detect PFAS levels, though they’re not routine and may require private labs.

  • Consult a Lawyer: Firms like Sokolove Law and Oberheiden P.C. offer free consultations to assess eligibility for lawsuits.

  • Act Quickly: Statutes of limitations are strict. Contact an attorney to understand deadlines in your state.

  • Join a Class Action: For those with lower exposure or less severe harm, class actions provide a way to seek compensation without individual litigation.

The Road Ahead

PFAS litigation is expected to expand as new research strengthens causal links and more victims come forward. The EPA’s 2024 classification of PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances will likely spur additional lawsuits. However, critics argue settlements fall short of the estimated $400 billion needed for nationwide cleanup, raising concerns about future corporate bankruptcies.

For victims, the fight is personal. Firefighters like Randall M., a Sokolove Law client, face cancer diagnoses after years of AFFF exposure, while communities grapple with tainted water. These lawsuits are not just about compensation—they’re about holding corporations accountable and preventing further harm.

If you or a loved one has been affected by PFAS, don’t wait. Reach out to a qualified attorney to explore your legal options and join the growing movement for justice.

Sources: Information compiled from various legal and news sources, including King Law, The New York Times, Oberheiden P.C., and posts on X.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Why Money Can't Buy Innovation

Innovation is often mistaken for a commodity that can be purchased with enough capital. Companies and governments pour billions into...

 
 
 

Comments


Pure Water Center of SoCal Inc.
Capturing the hearth of the world

Cities that we currently Serve

Porter Ranch

Mission Hills

Granada Hills

San Fernando

Val Verde

Stevenson Ranch

Newhall

Chatsworth

Pacoima

Sunland-Tujunga

Bouquet Canyon

Agua Dulce

Canyon Country

Valencia

Sun Valley

Northridge

Sylmar

Mint Canyon

Castaic

Saugus

bottom of page